The recent
discussions about economic development in the village have, to say the least,
been enlightening.
They could serve as transitions
from the now vaporized “downtown proposal” to the upcoming village election.
But they shouldn’t.
While it’s likely some
candidates may focus on the proposal-formerly-known-as-downtown, which would have
ruined the golf course and kept the village from getting the PGA tour, the
reality is that it is no longer the issue.
Good-bye, farewell, Auf
Wiedersehen, good bye, hasta la vista baby.
That’s why presentations by
Chris Stilling, the recent acquisition to the village manager’s office have
been, in many ways, a breath of fresh air.
One of Stilling’s main
functions, if not the main, has been to give Buffalo Grove’s seemingly sagging
retail environment a boost.
And he hasn’t mentioned ‘golf
course’ once.
More than a few weeks ago, I
began a series of blogs addressing economic development in the village. I posed four questions to the village fathers
and mother. The first question addressed the developer formerly-known-as-Malk
because he was trendy at the time.
Now however, he’s old news. As they might say at the bike shop -- Gone
with Schwinn.
So what now?
The result of Malk taking his
plan off the course should not have an impact on future development efforts in
the village.
“It may cause owners/developers
to re-evaluate their assets in BG and push forward any of their rehabilitation
and/or expansion plans to accommodate the realized needs or desires of Buffalo
Grove residents,” Trustee Steve Trilling told me in an email response. Trilling’s point makes sense, because it
appeared, at least in its preliminary and even secondary renderings, that the
“instant downtown” had not done that.
The focus of bringing the
mountain to town may lie in re-evaluating and redeveloping existing areas, best
known as corridors. The village’s
targets are likely to be the existing Dundee corridor and development of the
Milwaukee corridor, especially at Deerfield Parkway and Milwaukee Avenue.
Whatever does happen, however,
developers with ideas may find themselves under scrutiny.
Trustee Beverly Sussman said she
thinks Malk’s picking up and going home “should not have a tremendous impact on
other plans for economic development.”
She noted that there are “many corridors to work on for economic
development”.
Sussman noted too that “somehow,
somewhere, something has to be done with the Town Center. I know we don't own
it, but something has to be done to that eyesore.” The keywords are “we don’t own it.” So what can be done with the retail albatross? When you consider that its most successful tenants
Binny’s, Burger King, Boston Market and Brunswick’s it may make sense to have
more tenants that begin with the letter B.
People call attention to Town
Center because it stands out like a sore thumb. But, as Sussman notes, the
village does not own it and unless there’s a magical power of eminent domain
that would let the village do something with Town Center, any discussion about
the village involvement with it is basically a moot point.
While some folks seem to have
put all the development eggs in the CRM proposal, Trustee Jeff Berman points
out that “The need for economic development did not begin and does not end with
the demise of the CRM downtown proposal. The village definitely needs to
continue to work to diversify and improve its revenue profile. A key component
is economic development. On that point, there is neither doubt nor real
controversy.”
This, from my standpoint, is why
Stilling’s presentations have been a jolt of lightening in the discussion of
economic development.
Economic development is
something that falls into the village regular mode of operation. Waiting for elections where it becomes “an
issue” is not in the best interest of the village or is residents who may be
led to believe that the results of an election will result in an instant
panacea for economic development.
It’s more involved than just
building a retail outlet. It takes more
than a “Field of Dreams” mentality – just because you build it does not mean
they will come.
In fact, notes Village Manager
Dane Bragg, redevelopment can be more complicated than starting a project from
scratch. The reason, he says, is that
there are existing traffic patterns and infrastructure constrains that come
into play.
During a recent committee of the
whole meeting (also known as a workshop meeting), Board members were told that
a key to economic development, or in Buffalo Grove’s case, redevelopment, is
looking at available square footage, not numbers of vacancies.
The key here is the
flexibility. Bragg notes, for example
that 300,000 square feet of retail space can be split into “more productive
space” for a retailer. The village’s
vacancy rate is approximately in the neighborhood of 15 percent. For comparison sake, Chicago’s is 8.2
percent. Statistics, however, can be
squirrely things. Fueling Buffalo
Grove’s rate is the 63,000 square foot edifice at Lake-Cook and Arlington
Heights roads that used to be known as Dominick’s. Take that out of the equation and the
village’s vacancy rate drops to around 10 percent, which may still seem high,
but it’s important to factor in the vacant car showrooms along Dundee Road.
There’s no quick solution. Economic development – and redevelopment – is
a pain-staking strategic process. It can
be costly too if economic incentives come into place, and with cuts to
municipalities being eyeballed by the Rauner administration, it’s possible that
incentives will be harder to offer prospective retailers.
“We always take a careful look
at public financing,” Village President Jeff Braiman says. “We have always been conservative which is
one reason we have a AAA bond rating.”
This enhances the challenge for
attracting retail development.
Whatever approach the village
takes, it needs to be forward thinking.
Chuck Malk and his instant downtown are gone. Nothing is planned for the golf course.
The key is to look out the
windshield and not the rear-view mirror.
No comments:
Post a Comment