Last week’s announcement that longtime Board
Member Steve Trilling was stepping down did more than signal an end of more
than a decade of service, it should send a message to some members of the
Village Board.
That message is simple – use Trilling as an
example.
Trilling, who spent seven years on the Plan
Commission, two on the Appearance Commission and 15 years as a member of the
Village Board, handled each position with outstanding "...class,
distinction and honor…" That’s not to diminish the efforts done by others
who have, or are serving on the Board, but Trilling did so without a personal
agenda and without a need to showcase – something other Board Members, both
past and present have not done.
Trilling’s input was well thought out and
reflected his expertise as an industrial engineer. His approach to issues that
did not connect to engineering were equally well presented.
While the well-deserved accolades for Trilling
have taken front and center, it’s important to look at what may lie ahead
because one thing is certain – Trilling’s depth and insight will be missed.
With Trilling leaving the Board, that leaves
only Trustee Jeff Berman as the most vocal Board Member. Like Trilling,
Berman’s remarks reflect considerable, some may say excessive, insight and
research. Agree or not, it is apparent that Berman and Trilling know one thing
-- the status quo just won’t do.
And it shouldn’t.
Buffalo Grove residents, as should residents
of any school board, park board, municipality, county or state, should see
transparency from their elected officials. Items that may have significant
impact need to be discussed and clarified and not buried in the consent agenda.
Berman aside, discussion by most trustees is
limited and generally does not reflect a lot of insight into village
operations. You could argue that the village staff is doing its job so well that
there’s no reason to raise questions. And while the village is well run, it’s
not, as the late Al McGuire would say, all seashell and balloons.
You could also say that things are going so
well that there is no need for discussion by trustees. The keyword here is
could.
Aside from questions and occasional
challenges, mostly from Berman, meetings have turned into a series of supportive
comments for the village staff. This is not to dilute the quality of services
and operations provided by the village because, in general, they are excellent.
Residents, however, should hear more from
their elected officials.
What raises the ire of many residents is snow
removal, Buffalo Grove Days parking and anything that impacts their
neighborhood. Budget time brings out various wags who show up to insult the
work done by the Finance Department and then crawl back into their holes for
another year.
Outside of that, it’s the same collection of folks
who attend Board meetings who watch the same routine meeting-to-meeting.
Part of the problem, so it seems, is
preparation, or lack of, prior to meetings especially Committee of the Whole
meetings when items are presented by staff for discussion. While staff does an adequate
job presenting highlights via PowerPoint, it’s not unusual for some Board
members to ask inane questions that, had they read the materials prior to the meeting, would not need to
be asked.
But no, their lack of preparation does little
more than give them an opportunity to grandstand and sound engaged in the
discussion when in actuality they’re clueless.
Village Clerk Janet Sirabian bemoans the
pitiful turnout for village elections. She’s right. The lack of civic
engagement at the local level is weak. But it takes two to tango. How can
residents be engaged when many board members aren’t?
Regular Village Board meetings don’t foster
civic engagement and Committee of the Whole meetings are often exercises in
futility.
It’s not unusual for agendas to feature
resolutions and presentations on a variety of inane causes. The Village Board does,
however, recognize residents for significant accomplishments. Not only do they
get recognized, but it gives Board President Beverly Sussman the unique
opportunity to present highly coveted plastic buffalo pins.
But what about issues facing the village?
Village Manager Dane Bragg regularly updates the Board on issues, especially
those emulating from Springfield. But outside of those updates, there’s little
said. Some items are tossed onto the consent agenda which is generally rubber
stamped. Bragg told me that some items placed on the consent agenda by village
staff because they are routine. Others, however, could be of interest to
residents, especially those items relating to intergovernmental agreements or
mandates, such as the Cook County mandate regarding minimum wage.
But, in general, it doesn’t happen, and if
past performance is an indication, things are not likely to change unless some
trustees step up.
Trustees Joanne Johnson and Lester Ottenheimer
III have provided some insights and challenges in the past, but not to the
degree that Trilling did or Berman does. In his first two-years, trustee Dave
Weidenfeld has raised some points, but as someone who ran on the “Save Buffalo
Grove” ticket two years ago, he has not raised questions that indicate the
village needs saving.
And then there’s Trustee Andrew Stein who is
probably gloating over the fact that with Trilling’s departure he will move
over a seat because he has the second longest tenure on the Board (seating on
the dais is based on length of service with the most senior trustee sitting on
the right as you face the dais).
The length of tenure, however, doesn’t reflect
the nature of impact. Stein, who often, so it seems, takes a cue from Dr. Seuss
with an attitude of “…Look at
me!, Look at me!, Look at me NOW!” by grandstanding with incessant rambling about the Farmers Market and
recitation of successes at Stevenson and Buffalo Grove high schools that does
little than take up time and give him face time. For example, at the June
meeting Stein wore a Boy Scout uniform as part of the village’s tribute to several
Buffalo Grove scouts being honored for achieving the rank of Eagle Scout. It’s
an impressive accomplishment for the young men, but Stein stole some of the
thunder by wearing the uniform. Had he wore shorts he may have been mistaken
for someone auditioning for the Sound of Music.
What we need is for all trustees to provide input
and questions for staff. This not an indictment of the staff performance, but
members of any public body need be involved in decisions that impact
constituents and not just rubber stamp staff reports or recommendations.
Trustees, however, are not alone. Sussman too
must be more vocal about agenda items and issues facing the village. More than
two years ago she ran for Village President touting a need for transparency,
which needs to extend beyond the reaches of staff reports. The Board must
reflect the proverbial pulse of the community and not just bless and anoint
staff actions.
In her campaign, Sussman’s campaign literature
and signs touted that “experience is the best teacher.” My guess is she was
referring to her experience serving the village. I get that. However, I still don’t know who or what she is
teaching.
If it is civics, then the best experience for
residents is to hear dialogue and not just the thump of a rubber stamp.
Apparently with the departure of Mr. Trilling there's no Hank Raymonds to cover the cracked sidewalks. I hope this doesn't turn into a Dunkirk.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Steve Trilling will be missed, especially when it comes to the expertise that he brings to engineering matters before the Village. We all need to step up to try to fill the void created by Steve’s departure.
ReplyDeletePlease do not confuse my enthusiasm for our Village and the good things that are accomplished by its residents and volunteers, especially our younger residents, as anything other than pure civic pride. As Trustee Liaison, I report about the Committees and Commissions that I represent in order to promote their activities. Be it Health, Farmers Market, or Buffalo Grove Days I promoted their activities when they had something to promote. I also make sure that our residents are aware of the accomplishments of our Village’s youth.
As for the June Board Meeting, I am a Scout Leader and I wore my Scout Leader’s uniform in honor of and respect for the young men who earned the highest rank that a Boy Scout can earn, Eagle Scout. As I said when I spoke at that meeting, I worked with most of them along the way. And I do not apologize for that.
Speaking of apologies, I would like one from you for making the following reference:
“Had he wore shorts he may have been mistaken for Rolf from the Sound of Music”.
You may have meant to reference Friedrich or Kurt, but the character of Rolfe in the Sound of Music, was a Nazi, and I sir am no Nazi.
Andrew Stein
Andrew -- the intent was not to equate you to being a Nazi. Remember, he was not at the start of the production. Nonetheless, I've refined the text.
DeleteInteresting take... Some things I agree with, and some not so much.
ReplyDeleteI think there is some irony in calling out the dog and pony show, but also criticizing routine business being on the consent agenda. Do you want less fluffy things like buffalo pins and more substance, or do you want more dog and pony show by needlessly discussing routine consent agenda items? If the argument was that items were inappropriately being placed on the consent agenda, well, okay then. Let's discuss that. But, unless there is a specific example of something on the consent agenda that shouldn't be, there is nothing wrong. Keep in mind, that anyone can request an item be removed from the consent agenda, which has happened. That seems appropriate to me.
Where I think you are missing the mark is your implication that the role of a trustee is to challenge the staff. That couldn't be more wrong.
The way our system of local government was set up was for there to be two functioning roles - a board to set policy, and a village manager to execute day to day operations. It's the village manager's job to challenge and manage the staff, not the board. It's the board's job to set policy, and to hire a village manager to run the village. It's not the role of trustees to have "a lot of insight into village operations." That's part of the problem - this perception that the role of a trustee has to do with village operations. The role of a trustee is policy, and should not drift into village operations.
The purpose of the board meetings is to execute the financial and policy business of the village efficiently and appropriately, and to debate policy decisions. It is not so elected officials can campaign for reelection by looking like they are publicly asking the tough questions. In actuality, the time to ask the tough questions is behind the scenes; every trustee has access to the village manager outside of meetings. There is no problem with publicly stating that one asked a question before the meeting, and this was the answer; however, the meeting should not be a dog and pony show, perpetuating the appearance that all the decisions are being made publicly and transparently. Pressing staff is not transparency, and asking questions behind the scenes is not a lack off transparency. What transparency really is, is setting policy out in the open. It's debating the policy decision out in the open. Running the business of the village efficiently is not a lack of transparency.
To simplify this, keep in mind that there are very specific laws regarding transparency. Unless those laws are being violated, there is no lack of transparency.
Trustees are elected to make policy decisions that they feel are in the best interest of the village, not to manage the staff, or to sing and dance so that they can give residents the perception that they are doing their job, which ironically is not the actual job.
There are plenty of communication mechanisms available to both residents and trustees if they want to communicate on issues. But, village board meetings are not the place for elected officials to hijack the process of conducting the business of the village so that they can show voters how hard they are working for them. It's a place for residents to ask questions if they have them (actual transparency); but, that doesn't mean if the public has no questions, and the trustees understand the issue (don't really have any questions), that moving along and passing the item at hand without questions (also actual transparency) is anyone not doing their job.
I have no problem with saying here is the important issue, and here is where I stand on it and why. But, it's okay to do one's homework ahead of time in the form of asking staff questions before the meeting, and using the meeting to explain why one has made the decision that they made.
So, in a nutshell, I agree with you that we need less dog and pony show; and, I disagree with you that we need more dog and pony show. ;)