When the Village Board votes tonight on the 2016 budget, it will approve
$100,000 to study economic development along the Lake-Cook Road and Prairie
View corridors.
It’s important to
note that these are corridors.
Plural. More than one. The expenditure is part of the proposed 2016
budget (2016
Budget) which was discussed at length at the Board’s Nov. 16 meeting, and
calls for the study to be completed by Dec. 31, 2016.
The study represents
a concerted effort by the village to address comprehensive economic
development, not just one spot in the village.
The Lake-Cook corridor runs from Arlington Heights Road to Milwaukee
Avenue. No single area has been singled
out, nor has a developer or proposal been identified.
The Prairie View
corridor is the vicinity of the Prairie View METRA station and does not call
for additional annexation of residential areas that may be in unincorporated
Vernon Twp.
Pundits are likely
to do one of several things. The first
may be to chide the village for not being transparent. The budget has been available on the
village’s web site (as noted by the link above). The village also hosted an Economic
Development Open House from 5 to 7 last Wednesday.
Despite its rather
unusual timing, village staff, led by Community Development Director Chris Stilling
did more than just a “nice job” presenting the village’s progress and plans for
economic development.
But how many of the
30 or so residents who attended did more than listen. How many heard?
Economic development
entails more than attracting retail businesses.
An estimated 20,000 people work in Buffalo Grove each day. They range
from attorneys to the ever-popular sushi chefs, warehouse workers, health care
workers and educators among others who call Buffalo Grove their professional
home. Stilling estimates that 90 percent
of those who work in Buffalo Grove, live elsewhere. While this represents a potential market
segment, appealing to the workforce in Buffalo Grove is not the only
target. In fact, it would be interesting
to see how Buffalo Grove’s numbers compare to other communities.
Addressing the
Buffalo Grove-based workforce is one aspect of the Economic Development plan that
will be presented to, and hopefully discussed, by the Village Board at its Dec.
21 meeting. The plan is available at Economic
Development Plan.
The fact that the plan is so readily available would,
you would think and hope, alleviate accusations of lack of transparency and,
you would hope, foster discussions directly to economic development.
Have
more METRA trains, and the Weiland Road extension are not part of the Economic
Development plan. Of course, two words that emerge with any discussion about
economic development are Town Center.
While
the center is in a prime location, the village does not own it.
The
village cannot redesign it.
The
village cannot fill the vacancies.
The
village can, however, work with management of, not only Town Center, but other retail
and commercial developments in attracting prospective businesses to the
village, but the village is not a landlord.
Period.
The
Economic Development plan identifies, Stilling says, sites to be considered for
potential development. Village Planner
Nicole Woods also noted that there are a variety of tools available in the
plan, such as Tax Increment Financing.
However, it was made quite clear that no TIF districts have been
identified or approved.
While last week’s turnout was
admirable, especially given the early time, most of those attending seem to be
content on rhetoric that has been previously heard around the village – as in
the last election.
Beverly Sussman and Dave Weidenfeld were elected via
the “Save Buffalo Grove Now” effort on the premise that the village needs to
maintain green space, an effort fueled by the proposed effort to develop much
of the Buffalo Grove Golf Course by CRM properties. That proposal is gone. The need for economic development is not.
Stilling and the rest of the village staff have been
working doggedly to get things moving, which appears to be the case.
However, if you gauge the movement by what activities
at public meetings, you may wonder. Last
week’s meeting, while seemingly well attended, included many of the same folks
who have voice the same arguments before.
Many of the attendees are longtime village residents who are resistant
to change. A prevailing attitude seems
to be that Buffalo Grove is a bedroom community and that’s what it should remain.
Both Weidenfeld and Sussman attended the meeting and
neither contributed to the discussion.
Let’s cut Weidenfeld some slack because he’s still the new kid on the
block. Sort of.
Sussman, however, touted the need for business
development, an economic development website etc. As a former small business owner, and now
Village President, you’d think she would be at the forefront of the movement.
Apparently not.
Sussman sat toward the back of the meeting last Wednesday and did not
say a word on behalf of staff efforts, or her vision for economic and community
development.
And while the dialogue between residents and staff
was good, much of what was presented were ideas flowing from the same recipes
for leftovers.
The Village Manager’s office staff, from Village
Manager Dane Bragg on down appears to have things in focus. Perfect?
Nothing is perfect.
The constant allegations that the village does nothing,
and repetitive whining that the village can’t change, has run its course. The $100,000 earmarked for studying economic
development corridors is money well spent.
Even if it means changes in the village, like
development of a downtown.
Oh wait, I’m sorry.
At least week’s meeting the term “downtown” was replaced with the phrase
“focal point.”
Why? My guess is
to keep Buffalo Grove the same and not rattle the Geritol bottles of those
resistant to change.
Petula Clark would be devastated.
Just imagine what it would be like if the NFL adopted
a similar ideology.
No longer would Joe Montana, Bart Starr, Tom Brady,
John Elway, Brett Favre, Roger Staubach be known as Super Bowl quarterbacks,
but as “Focal Points”.
Call them what you want – the results were the same.
Not because of what they were called, but because of
a game plan.
The village is moving in that direction. Staff is working on a game plan that
addresses the game as it is played now.
It’s time to look at next week’s game and not last
year’s loss.
As an attendee at the economic development meeting I cam e away with a little different attitude than that of Stan Zoller's. I think his comments regarding Bev Sussman and Dave Weidenfeld bordered on the harsh side.
ReplyDeleteStan seems to think that Bev and Dave should be leading the parade to get the economic plan turned into reality. Maybe so, but what about all the other people who have served, and continue to serve, on the village board. Over the years' there hasn't been a lot of public comment about an economic development plan. There may have been activity, but as one of the current trustees says, there weren't any results. As I mentioned to Mr. Stilling after the meeting, one pitfall to the plan presented not working is not having action on it take place while the plan is still viable and relevant. It doesn't take long for times to change and if one spends time planning and not doing, the plan doesn't fit anymore.
Because of past history, "Focal points" is a much better and neutral term than "downtown". Based on my information, Save BG still exists and functions. The word "downtown" can rankle many of 1100+ Save BG members. For now, Save BG has moved on to other issues. Save BG is supporting the Buffalo Creek Clean Watershed Group and is keeping abreast of the village's efforts on economic development. Save BG will be happy to help regarding fostering acceptable economic development in any way. But, I believe many Save BG members, and others, have not forgotten the downtown "situation".
So lighten up a little, Stan.
Leon Gopon