Last week’s announcement that longtime Board
Member Steve Trilling was stepping down did more than signal an end of more
than a decade of service, it should send a message to some members of the
Village Board.
That message is simple – use Trilling as an
example.
Trilling, who spent seven years on the Plan
Commission, two on the Appearance Commission and 15 years as a member of the
Village Board, handled each position with outstanding "...class,
distinction and honor…" That’s not to diminish the efforts done by others
who have, or are serving on the Board, but Trilling did so without a personal
agenda and without a need to showcase – something other Board Members, both
past and present have not done.
Trilling’s input was well thought out and
reflected his expertise as an industrial engineer. His approach to issues that
did not connect to engineering were equally well presented.
While the well-deserved accolades for Trilling
have taken front and center, it’s important to look at what may lie ahead
because one thing is certain – Trilling’s depth and insight will be missed.
With Trilling leaving the Board, that leaves
only Trustee Jeff Berman as the most vocal Board Member. Like Trilling,
Berman’s remarks reflect considerable, some may say excessive, insight and
research. Agree or not, it is apparent that Berman and Trilling know one thing
-- the status quo just won’t do.
And it shouldn’t.
Buffalo Grove residents, as should residents
of any school board, park board, municipality, county or state, should see
transparency from their elected officials. Items that may have significant
impact need to be discussed and clarified and not buried in the consent agenda.
Berman aside, discussion by most trustees is
limited and generally does not reflect a lot of insight into village
operations. You could argue that the village staff is doing its job so well that
there’s no reason to raise questions. And while the village is well run, it’s
not, as the late Al McGuire would say, all seashell and balloons.
You could also say that things are going so
well that there is no need for discussion by trustees. The keyword here is
could.
Aside from questions and occasional
challenges, mostly from Berman, meetings have turned into a series of supportive
comments for the village staff. This is not to dilute the quality of services
and operations provided by the village because, in general, they are excellent.
Residents, however, should hear more from
their elected officials.
What raises the ire of many residents is snow
removal, Buffalo Grove Days parking and anything that impacts their
neighborhood. Budget time brings out various wags who show up to insult the
work done by the Finance Department and then crawl back into their holes for
another year.
Outside of that, it’s the same collection of folks
who attend Board meetings who watch the same routine meeting-to-meeting.
Part of the problem, so it seems, is
preparation, or lack of, prior to meetings especially Committee of the Whole
meetings when items are presented by staff for discussion. While staff does an adequate
job presenting highlights via PowerPoint, it’s not unusual for some Board
members to ask inane questions that, had they read the materials prior to the meeting, would not need to
be asked.
But no, their lack of preparation does little
more than give them an opportunity to grandstand and sound engaged in the
discussion when in actuality they’re clueless.
Village Clerk Janet Sirabian bemoans the
pitiful turnout for village elections. She’s right. The lack of civic
engagement at the local level is weak. But it takes two to tango. How can
residents be engaged when many board members aren’t?
Regular Village Board meetings don’t foster
civic engagement and Committee of the Whole meetings are often exercises in
futility.
It’s not unusual for agendas to feature
resolutions and presentations on a variety of inane causes. The Village Board does,
however, recognize residents for significant accomplishments. Not only do they
get recognized, but it gives Board President Beverly Sussman the unique
opportunity to present highly coveted plastic buffalo pins.
But what about issues facing the village?
Village Manager Dane Bragg regularly updates the Board on issues, especially
those emulating from Springfield. But outside of those updates, there’s little
said. Some items are tossed onto the consent agenda which is generally rubber
stamped. Bragg told me that some items placed on the consent agenda by village
staff because they are routine. Others, however, could be of interest to
residents, especially those items relating to intergovernmental agreements or
mandates, such as the Cook County mandate regarding minimum wage.
But, in general, it doesn’t happen, and if
past performance is an indication, things are not likely to change unless some
trustees step up.
Trustees Joanne Johnson and Lester Ottenheimer
III have provided some insights and challenges in the past, but not to the
degree that Trilling did or Berman does. In his first two-years, trustee Dave
Weidenfeld has raised some points, but as someone who ran on the “Save Buffalo
Grove” ticket two years ago, he has not raised questions that indicate the
village needs saving.
And then there’s Trustee Andrew Stein who is
probably gloating over the fact that with Trilling’s departure he will move
over a seat because he has the second longest tenure on the Board (seating on
the dais is based on length of service with the most senior trustee sitting on
the right as you face the dais).
The length of tenure, however, doesn’t reflect
the nature of impact. Stein, who often, so it seems, takes a cue from Dr. Seuss
with an attitude of “…Look at
me!, Look at me!, Look at me NOW!” by grandstanding with incessant rambling about the Farmers Market and
recitation of successes at Stevenson and Buffalo Grove high schools that does
little than take up time and give him face time. For example, at the June
meeting Stein wore a Boy Scout uniform as part of the village’s tribute to several
Buffalo Grove scouts being honored for achieving the rank of Eagle Scout. It’s
an impressive accomplishment for the young men, but Stein stole some of the
thunder by wearing the uniform. Had he wore shorts he may have been mistaken
for someone auditioning for the Sound of Music.
What we need is for all trustees to provide input
and questions for staff. This not an indictment of the staff performance, but
members of any public body need be involved in decisions that impact
constituents and not just rubber stamp staff reports or recommendations.
Trustees, however, are not alone. Sussman too
must be more vocal about agenda items and issues facing the village. More than
two years ago she ran for Village President touting a need for transparency,
which needs to extend beyond the reaches of staff reports. The Board must
reflect the proverbial pulse of the community and not just bless and anoint
staff actions.
In her campaign, Sussman’s campaign literature
and signs touted that “experience is the best teacher.” My guess is she was
referring to her experience serving the village. I get that. However, I still don’t know who or what she is
teaching.
If it is civics, then the best experience for
residents is to hear dialogue and not just the thump of a rubber stamp.