Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Coordinated efforts focal point to responding to active-shooters


As hundreds of thousands of people, most of them students, demonstrated against gun violence to try and get action from the nation’s lawmakers, two questions may have been on a lot of people’s minds.  One, can it happen at my or my child’s school, and two, how prepared are local first responders to handle an active shooter in a school?

Since the Feb. 14 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the political rhetoric and voices of high school students nationwide have resonated from coast-to-coast and will hopefully continue.

And while the debate continues, ways to prevent the kind of carnage we saw in Florida, Las Vegas and far too many other cities and schools, one question people might be asking is: can it happen here?  The answer is, unfortunately, yes it probably could happen at a school in Buffalo Grove or, for that matter, any school.

That stark reality raises another question:  are the schools prepared to respond to an active shooter? In a perfect world, the answer is yes.  However, as we’ve seen, this is hardly a perfect world.  The reality is that no matter how many drills and procedures a school may have, dealing with an actual situation is a horse of a different color.

Fortunately both Stevenson and Buffalo Grove High Schools are served outstanding first-responders who work with the schools in the development of response protocol in the event of an active shooter.

Buffalo Grove Police Chief Steven Casstevens presented a detailed synopsis about school safety at the Board’s Feb. 26 meeting.  His focus, obviously, was on Buffalo Grove High School as Stevenson High School is in Lincolnshire.

That does not mean, however, that the village is not part of a response plan to Stevenson.  Even though  students who live in the Lake County portion of the village attend Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, the BGPD is actively involved in a response plan to Stevenson.

District 125 spokesperson Jim Conrey told me via email that “We have not made any revisions or changes to our security procedures since the shooting in Florida. Regarding general procedures, all adults entering our building who are not employees must check in, during which time we conduct a background check on them. The public only may enter the building at four locations, all manned by security personnel.”

Despite its Lincolnshire location, Conrey said “while Stevenson is not in Buffalo Grove, we have worked with and will continue to work with the BG Police Department on security issues.”

Commander Kimberly Covelli of the Lincolnshire Police Department noted that a response to an active shooter at Stevenson would include police departments from the communities that feed Stevenson. In addition to Buffalo Grove and Lincolnshire, the Lake County Sheriff’s Office as well as Hawthorn Woods, Vernon Hills, Mundelein, Kildeer, Lake Zurich, and Riverwoods police departments would have a role.

Covelli said via email that “We are constantly evaluating our emergency response plans to schools, as well as all public buildings.  We feel confident our current tactical plan meets the objectives of student, faculty, and staff safety.”

As expected, plans for an emergency are discussed on a proactive basis. “Each year, members from the police department meet with Stevenson staff members and members from the Lincolnshire-Riverwoods Fire Department to discuss the school’s safety plans,” Covelli said.

“The plan itself, including any revisions, are discussed at this meeting. In the past, if the school has suggested a significant change to their plan, officials have asked for our department’s input into their plan.  Essentially, Stevenson’s safety plan is just that – their own plan.  Each entity has different roles but at the same time understand we all need to work together toward achieving the same end goal – safety of the students, staff, and any other school visitors. In addition, we also have officers from our department coordinate with school staff on helping conduct their annual lockdown drills,” Covelli said.

The Buffalo Grove Police Department, like other departments, has response plans for active shooter. In what might be deemed a sad statement of things, I originally contacted the BGPD after the Las Vegas shootings which left 58 people dead.

At that time, Michael Szos Deputy Chief of Administration for the BGPD indicated that the department conducts year-round training that helps prepare not only officers, but dispatchers and the fire department as well, for an active shooter incident.

Szos said via email that the training is not done in response to any specific event, but “is meant to offer continued training to officers on neutralizing a threat as quickly and safely as possible.”

He added that “officers are trained in proper entry formations into a building where there is an active threat. Officers focus on negating that threat as quickly as possible, by communicating with each other, forthcoming units, dispatch, the fire department and other agencies.

“These scenarios are fast evolving and designed to challenge officers while also familiarizing them with different buildings throughout the village.” Szos said the training has taken place in schools, commercial buildings and office structures as well.

Casstevens told me that in the event of an active shooter in a school, all personnel from the BGPD responds. This includes uniformed and plain-clothes officers.

Resources are readily available at what Szos calls “a moment’s notice.” Augmenting those resources, Szos said “officers are also equipped with an AR-15 rifle in every squad car, which they train with several times a year. There are maps of schools and some office building interiors given to officers, which aid them in locating suspects and victims in the event of a catastrophe.”

It is an impressive array of planning by the Lincolnshire and Buffalo Grove police departments. Unfortunately, it reflects what we see happening today.

It’s clear that steps to handling active-shooter situations are in place.  The challenge is to work on prevention.

Friday, March 16, 2018

Power and importance of student voices can't be ignored


The walk-outs by thousands of high school students on Wednesday did more than call attention to a revamping of the nation’s gun laws, they also provided Americans with several other things.

A wake-up call.

A civics lesson.

And a realization that high school students today are doing what high school students did when I was in high school -- speak up and demand to be heard.

When Baby Boomers were in high school, we were dealing with Vietnam, equal rights for women and the lowering of the voting age from 21 to 18.

Vietnam was popular with very few people while the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and the lowering of the voting age in Illinois via Project 18, sparked divisive debates across generations.

The murders of students by gunfire appears to be no different as they seem to be awakening a generation that has discovered it has a voice that needs to be heard.

Parents, politicians and school administrators need to listen.

Buffalo Grove’s two high schools allowed students to participate in the March, although in different ways.
Students gather at Buffalo Grove High School
to speak out against gun violence


Buffalo Grove High School allowed students to congregate only near the main entrance. The entire campus was off limits to anyone with one security office saying it was because the march was a “school event,” which make no sense. Neither does the comment by another security officer who said I wouldn’t be allowed to take pictures because many of the students were minors.

The district’s official position, said Jennifer Delgado, communications supervisor for District 214 was “the District decided to restrict access to our campuses for a brief period this morning to ensure the safety and security of our students during this morning's walkout. The decision to briefly restrict access is also in line with how most schools in the Chicagoland area handled the nationwide walkouts.”

Delgado added that “These displays were student-led and peaceful, and our student leaders did a phenomenal job making sure everyone was back in the building when the 17 minutes were over.”

Spoken like a true flack.

It’s interesting that she said, “The decision to briefly restrict access” was “in line with how most schools in the Chicagoland area handled the nationwide walkouts.”

Guess Stevenson has been annexed by Kenosha.

According to District 125 spokesman Jim Conrey, “We had an estimated 2,000 students participate in the walkout (today). We reached agreement with the student organizers to have an organized march starting from the "circle drive" entrance and heading south along the building to the Garden of Peace, Hope and Remembrance. From there, students walked into the alley behind the school building to go back inside and return to class. The walkout went off without incident.”

While the school blocked its entrance on Illinois Rt. 22 (Half Day Road), access was available through its Port Clinton Road entrance.

The need for tight security is understandable. The display of officers from the Buffalo Grove Police Department at BGHS was unprecedented for a “school event” – even the truck enforcement officer was there.

By limiting students -- as many districts did – including one which allegedly told students they could march if they didn’t say anything political, are educators limiting the opportunity for students to become civically engaged?

Downers Grove District 99 reportedly issued nearly 1,000 detentions to students who were brazen enough to participate in marches at Downers Grove North and South high schools.  The detentions, according to one media report, will be in an auditorium where there will be conversations about gun violence.

A nice gesture, but what is the result of these conversations? Student voices need to be continuously heard in public, by the public and by lawmakers – not just by school administrators who are bent on control issues.

What goes around comes around as it did in the Vietnam era of the 1960s. Students at the collegiate and scholastic levels were relentless in their actions and messages. Today’s students need have that same relentlessness and resiliency so their concerns become actions in the nation’s statehouses and in Washington, D.C.

People – whether students or not – need make sure their voices are continually heard and not silenced by overzealous school administrators or PAC-induced lawmakers.

People’s voices, not silence, will make a difference.

But only if people listen and act before it’s too late. Again.