Several people have asked me why I have equated Lisa Stone's method of operation, to be polite, to that used by the late Joseph McCarthy, the republican senator from Wisconsin.
But it's a different McCarthy.
I've given it some thought and by gosh, they are right -- Stone is practicing McCarthyism.
But it's a different McCarthy.
Granted, it seems as thought Liza acts like Sen. McCarthy, immortalized by his wanton attacks on people he didn't like without cause.
But after attending a vast number of Village Board meetings the past 14 months, it's become clear to me that Miz Stoney is practicing the McCarthyism made famous not by Joseph McCarthy -- but Charlie McCarthy.
Far fetched? Any time you're talking about Lisa Stone anything can be far fetched.
Far fetched? Any time you're talking about Lisa Stone anything can be far fetched.
But why Charlie and not Gene? All you need to do is watch the board meetings. Stone seems to have her own special causes that she takes up valuable board time and village money ranting about.
Stone specifically is wrapped up in a five-year old meeting involving the now infamous Land and Lakes Landfill, which came as a result of alleged complaints about odors from the compost transfer station. Oh my gosh, it smells. Hmm, no one came to the Village Board and no one seemed to complain except to Miz Stone.
All of a sudden it has become a major environmental issue. Why hasn't Stone expressed concern about the environmental impact of the Pekara Avenue Sewage Treatment Plant? Or how about the environmental impact of Chicago Executive Airport?
Because no one has their hands, figuratively mind your, under her short to control her mouth the way Edgar Bergen controlled Charlie McCarthy's
And where did Stoney get the background on filing Freedom or Information Act requests?
She does not have the educational background nor the professional background in municipal or government affairs. Her village-posted background lists involvement in school-based organizations and also says she is a retired legal research consultant and a retired Precinct Committeewoman. I'm not sure if retired mean she is actually retired, or a clever way of saying not retained. That, however, is inmaterial.
What is not, however, is the fact that Stone does not appear to be her own person. As a reader posted in a previous blog, Stone pays little attention to Board business that is not focused on her agenda. It is not unusual for her to arrive at Board meetings with prewritten comments that, to no surprise rip another board member or village staff member.
Stone's knee-jerk reaction to Board issues after they have been discussed leads me to believe that her Edgar Bergen has gotten in touch with her as if to say "what were you thinking -- here's what you should gave said.."
It often appears that Stone takes cues from an individual or individuals in the audience and it's widely known that she has received text messages during the meetings.
If Stone is going to represent the entire village, then she needs to be her own person and not some puppet for someone who does not have fortitude to speak their mind.
Otherwise people will see that Stone really is McCarthy, but not Joseph McCarthy, Charlie McCarthy.
And the village can't afford that.